0°

#测评#中国速度 沙田CN2 香港大盘低价xen VPS简单测评

中国速度是一家成立于2011年的国人IDC商家,本次主要针对xen虚拟架构技术,这是他家香港茶田CN2的测评其实看上去还是不错的.性价比较高的.说实话对于中国大陆或者是亚洲的备份或者是建一个站都特别不错的

CPU测试


CPU型号: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 0 @ 2.90GHz
CPU核数:2
CPU主频: 2900.102 MHz
内存: 992 MB
SWAP: 991 MB
IP地域信息: 中国 香港 cloudinnovation.org
虚拟技术:xen
测试时间 : 2018-02-20 21:06:52

IO性能测试

第一次测试: 501 MB/s
第二次测试: 480 MB/s
第三次测试: 486 MB/s
平均结果: 489 MB/s

 

带宽测试

下载带宽:8.55 Mbit/s 
上传带宽:1.45 Mbit/s

下载速度测试

下载文件服务器下载文件服务器下载速度
Node NameIPv4 addressDownload Speed
CacheFly205.234.175.1751007KB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP106.187.96.1481.03MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG139.162.23.41.03MB/s
Linode, London, UK176.58.107.391.02MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE139.162.130.81.01MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA50.116.14.9958KB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX173.192.68.18845KB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA67.228.112.250927KB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE159.122.69.4964KB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG119.81.28.1701014KB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN119.81.130.1701.00MB/s

IP 延迟测试

#大盘#中国速度 Xen 2H 1G 300G SSD 2M 独享 不限量 超大盘 ¥350/年

路由跟踪

西北偏远地区测试(电信)

#大盘#中国速度 Xen 2H 1G 300G SSD 2M 独享 不限量 超大盘 ¥350/年

回程路由测试:

广州电信(天翼云) 回程:

                                   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. the first row hidden                          0.0%    10    3.8   4.1   2.9  11.0   2.5
  2. 10.27.80.1                    0.0%    10    0.4   0.7   0.3   2.8   0.7
  3. 210.48.137.33                 0.0%    10    1.5   1.3   1.1   1.7   0.2
  4. 59.43.250.25                  0.0%    10    1.1   5.8   1.1  48.6  15.0
  5. 59.43.250.81                  0.0%    10   11.5  14.0   5.7  81.9  23.9
  6. 59.43.187.157                40.0%    10   15.9   8.5   6.3  15.9   3.8
  7. 59.43.130.105                 0.0%    10    8.2   8.2   8.1   8.3   0.1
  8. 59.43.80.22                   0.0%    10    9.8  10.2   9.0  11.4   0.8
  9. 183.59.13.173                 0.0%    10   11.3   7.5   7.0  11.3   1.3
 10. 183.56.128.14                 0.0%    10    8.7   8.7   8.6   8.9   0.1
 11. 14.215.116.1                  0.0%    10   11.4  10.2   9.8  11.4   0.5

上海电信(天翼云) 回程:

                                   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. the first row hidden                          0.0%    10    5.2   6.2   2.9  26.2   7.3
  2. 10.27.80.1                    0.0%    10    0.3   1.3   0.3   4.5   1.5
  3. 210.48.137.33                 0.0%    10    1.1   2.0   1.1   9.0   2.5
  4. 59.43.249.9                   0.0%    10   19.2   2.9   1.1  19.2   5.7
  5. 59.43.188.121                10.0%    10    3.8   9.8   3.8  39.4  12.6
  6. 59.43.244.142                80.0%    10    4.9   5.0   4.9   5.1   0.1
  7. 202.97.91.205                 0.0%    10    8.7   9.4   6.4  12.1   1.8
  8. 202.97.91.153                 0.0%    10   26.0  20.7  14.3  27.9   4.9
  9. 202.101.63.53                 0.0%    10   44.0  44.5  37.2  52.8   6.0
 10. 101.95.206.6                 90.0%    10   39.7  39.7  39.7  39.7   0.0
 11. 101.227.255.45                0.0%    10   42.0  41.8  34.5  50.7   6.0

厦门电信CN2 回程:

                                   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. the first row hidden                          0.0%    10    2.9   5.0   2.9  17.3   4.4
  2. 10.27.80.1                    0.0%    10    0.3   0.4   0.2   0.6   0.1
  3. 210.48.137.33                 0.0%    10    1.1   1.6   1.1   5.6   1.4
  4. 59.43.247.229                20.0%    10    7.9  20.8   1.9  52.4  19.0
  5. 59.43.250.77                  0.0%    10    5.6  14.1   5.6  50.3  16.8
  6. 59.43.187.101                 0.0%    10    7.3   7.5   7.1   8.9   0.6
  7. 59.43.130.153                 0.0%    10    7.9  18.7   7.8  65.2  22.0
  8. 59.43.98.206                  0.0%    10   17.8  18.2  17.8  20.1   0.7
  9. 27.148.195.54                 0.0%    10   31.2  31.3  31.2  31.5   0.1
 10. 27.148.195.6                  0.0%    10   31.9  32.8  31.8  36.5   1.7
 11. 117.25.150.130               30.0%    10  165.7 104.9  35.5 175.5  64.2
 12. 117.25.141.150                0.0%    10   35.4  36.9  35.0  48.1   4.0
 13. 117.28.254.129                0.0%    10   30.3  22.6  20.1  30.3   3.0

重庆联通 回程:

                                   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. the first row hidden                          0.0%    10    2.9   5.6   2.8  29.2   8.3
  2. 10.27.80.1                    0.0%    10    0.4   0.9   0.3   2.4   0.7
  3. 210.48.137.33                10.0%    10   12.0   5.6   1.1  23.1   7.6
  4. 59.43.249.1                   0.0%    10   26.4   6.9   1.8  28.2  10.7
  5. 219.158.40.141               10.0%    10    7.9   5.1   3.0   7.9   1.7
  6. 219.158.112.213              10.0%    10   13.2  12.6  10.8  15.9   1.7
  7. 219.158.97.30                10.0%    10   14.3  11.0   7.7  14.8   2.7
  8. 219.158.8.113                10.0%    10   11.7  12.6   9.3  15.4   1.8
  9. 219.158.99.122               10.0%    10   33.3  35.5  33.3  37.2   1.2
 10. 113.207.25.114               20.0%    10   34.2  35.6  34.1  41.6   2.6
 11. 58.144.255.46                20.0%    10   36.6  36.4  35.1  39.7   1.7
 12. 113.207.32.65                10.0%    10   34.6  34.7  34.5  35.0   0.2

上海移动 回程:

                                   Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. the first row hidden                          0.0%    10    7.6   4.6   2.8   7.6   1.7
  2. 10.27.80.1                    0.0%    10    0.5   1.2   0.3   3.6   1.2
  3. 210.48.137.33                 0.0%    10    1.1   1.6   1.0   5.7   1.4
  4. 59.43.249.1                   0.0%    10    1.9   1.8   1.8   1.9   0.1
  5. 59.43.189.81                  0.0%    10   31.9  32.0  31.9  32.1   0.1
  6. 59.43.244.118                 0.0%    10   35.3  34.2  32.2  35.6   1.2
  7. 202.97.94.225                 0.0%    10  126.2  90.8  31.4 132.2  48.0
  8. 202.97.50.157                 0.0%    10  130.1  94.0  32.5 136.2  47.1
  9. 202.97.46.58                  0.0%    10  123.1  94.4  31.2 147.5  49.6
 10. 202.97.15.6                   0.0%    10  122.3  93.8  33.4 134.0  46.6
 11. 221.176.17.165                0.0%    10  129.6  99.2  34.1 133.5  41.3
 12. 221.183.12.170               10.0%    10  122.5  97.6  33.2 134.0  41.9
 13. .                             0.0%    10  123.0  97.1  34.3 136.1  46.4
 14. .                             0.0%    10  123.6 101.0  36.6 141.2  47.0
 15. .                            10.0%    10  136.0 103.3  34.8 142.6  50.3

海外服务器Ping测试:

Linode日本 :

PING speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=59.5 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=59.6 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=59.3 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=59.4 ms
64 bytes from speedtest.tokyo.linode.com (106.187.96.148): icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=60.3 ms

--- speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4066ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 59.397/59.684/60.309/0.328 ms

Vultr日本 :

PING hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com (108.61.201.151) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=51.6 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=51.7 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=51.7 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=52.9 ms
64 bytes from 108.61.201.151.vultr.com (108.61.201.151): icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=55.3 ms

--- hnd-jp-ping.vultr.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4061ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 51.629/52.677/55.368/1.431 ms

Budgetvm洛杉矶 :

PING 192.157.214.6 (192.157.214.6) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=158 ms
64 bytes from 192.157.214.6: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=156 ms

--- 192.157.214.6 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4161ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 156.160/156.749/158.544/1.033 ms

kdatacenter韩国SK :

PING downloadtest.kdatacenter.com (211.33.122.250) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=112 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=112 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=112 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=111 ms
64 bytes from 211.33.122.250: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=112 ms

--- downloadtest.kdatacenter.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4116ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 111.999/112.230/112.542/0.459 ms

星光韩国KT :

PING 210.92.18.1 (210.92.18.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=240 time=84.7 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=240 time=83.0 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=240 time=82.8 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=240 time=84.3 ms
64 bytes from 210.92.18.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=240 time=84.0 ms

--- 210.92.18.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4090ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 82.843/83.804/84.720/0.823 ms

UnixBench跑分测试:

   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: MyCloudServer: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-358.6.1.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 19:29:00 UTC 2013
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 0 @ 2.90GHz (5800.2 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 0 @ 2.90GHz (5800.2 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   20:10:22 up  2:11,  1 user,  load average: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 3

单核跑分

————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Tue Feb 20 2018 20:10:22 - 20:38:31
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       30201111.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3349.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1268.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        231504.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           61754.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        693373.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              373161.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  60740.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2532.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2969.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    564.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         453146.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   30201111.5   2587.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3349.3    609.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1268.2    294.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     231504.1    584.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      61754.2    373.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     693373.0   1195.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     373161.9    300.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      60740.3    151.9
Process Creation                                126.0       2532.7    201.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2969.1    700.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        564.5    940.8
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     453146.3    302.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         495.8

全核跑分

————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Tue Feb 20 2018 20:38:31 - 21:06:45
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       60160209.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     6677.0 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2510.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        352217.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           91350.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1111973.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              737242.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 115972.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               4861.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4261.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    569.2 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         827831.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   60160209.3   5155.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6677.0   1214.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2510.1    583.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     352217.9    889.4
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      91350.0    552.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1111973.0   1917.2
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     737242.2    592.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     115972.9    289.9
Process Creation                                126.0       4861.4    385.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4261.7   1005.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        569.2    948.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     827831.4    551.9
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         838.0

 

「点点赞赏,手留余香」

    还没有人赞赏,快来当第一个赞赏的人吧!